Minorities should feel Safe.... What about Majority??

“Minorities should feel safe and have faith in law. We must be cautious of the forces that weaken secularism in the country .The cabinet has approved the Prevention of Communal Violence Bill. I hope it is passed in parliament soon. The law and order machinery should ensure that if there is any issue which is disturbing communal harmony … it should be controlled immediately and not allowed to spread,” she said at the launch of the National Waqf Development Corporation Limited (NAWADCO)

Minorities should feel safe. Fine.

What about the Majority?

……..First Congress says we don’t divide people in the name of religion.

Then within days Jains declared a Minority.

Then Rahul talks of Modi Govt’s involvement in 2002 riots

Then Sonia Gandhi talks of safeguarding Secular ethos…

Now these Minorities should feel safe statement…

Congress and its own divided religious and regional political group have not matured enough to understand and digest the democratic values and principles. Because their ideology is too old and they do not come out from their narrow mentality and see the true democracy meant and mentioned in the constitution of India. They are only interested to divide the people into regional, religional and castist lines and do not offer anything to the people of India and to the followers who are blindly supporting them without understanding the true value of democracy and democratic principles. Today’s India is well aware about true meaning of the democracy and rights of the people. 60 to 66 years after we got freedom from British, the party who ruled this country continuously for more than three to four decades did not remove social evils like castism and regionalism from the blood and minds of Indian Citizen. They failed to give pave the ways for fill the nationalism in the people’s mind. They forgot to detach caste, color, regionalism from the politics and their lies the problem we are facing in India. The smaller political parties spread upon in the various parts of our country is actually the B group of Indian National Congress who allowed them to grow it so that they can continue to divide and rule this country forever. The end result is citizen of India do not get the true result of democracy and they, the citizen, also forgot to remind or force the political class for their political responsibility thereby three pillars of Indian Democracy – Parliament, Judiciary and Media totally became rotten and omitting bad ethics which suits them to loot the public. Parliament failed to work for the people of India; Judiciary to give true justice to the people within a time frame manner, media spit the beans of un-ethics and dividing values. Media as usual, taking one or two sentences from the entire speech and making their own stories, particularly English Media who are obsessed for foreign culture to grow here in India. People of India should awaken from their 66 years of long sleep and support the people and political parties who value the democracy and democratic principles and stands for national pride and save their nationality.

Comedy Night with Arnab

Arnab asking questions.......Rahul only one reply...:- Bring youngster, change system, women empowerment.... almost for all questions he replied with the same answer. Rahul not answered even a single question.

The interview questions were so many.... and Rahul Gandhi spoke only the below words again and again and again.... MNREGA, RTI, Openness, LOKPAL, Process, Structure..... All the answers were dumb. He does not know what he is speaking. Felt like he mugged up something and kept answering the same thing whatever Arnab questions.

I found the answers went above my head. He has been only firing in the air. His repeated emphasis was that he wanted to change the system. He also talked of empowering the women and the youth. Why couldn't he do it during the last ten years? He said, “I do not like what I see in Indian politics … the system in this country needs to change, I don't see anything else and I am blind to everything else” There is no change in any system during the last ten years and the systems will remain the same even if Congress comes to power. Truly, he is blind to “everything else” and that is why the scams and corruption has not received his attention. Then he says, “Democracy is about respect of processes. Democracy is about non-arbitrary decisions. Democracy is about spreading decisions….. It needs to push democracy into the villagers, it needs to give women democratic powers, and it needs to give youngsters democratic powers.” It is all theoretical. What has been done by the Congress government during the last five decades? Does he mean that the previous prime ministers of his party had no vision about it and that is why the democracy has not reached the villages yet? By saying that “BJP believes in concentration of power” he has made a laughing stock of himself as it applies to his party. Accepting that “Some Congress men were probably involved”, he evaded the question about that even after almost three decades no action was taken against them. In spite of Goswami repeatedly talking about apology, Rahul Gandhi kept evading the answer and said “I wasn’t involved in the riots at all.” Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones on others. Regarding his reply to the alliance with Lalu Prasad who has been convicted, his reply “These decisions of the Congress party are made by senior leaders. Our alliance in Bihar is with a political party; with an idea not an individual” sounds totally illogical and funny.

When asked about Mr. Kalmadi, Mr. Virbhadra Singh, Ashok Chavan & other corruption alleged ministers, He looked at Arnab in shock as if he was hearing their name for the 1st time. Some of the absurd responses to the above were.... I am bringing youngsters, I passed LOKPAL... etc. when it comes to Congress he wants to go by proper legal process, but when it is about BJP he can completely ignore the High-Court and pass his own judgment..........  

One of the funniest things I felt throughout the interview was that Rahul Gandhi was talking as if the he is leader of an opposition party. Whatever concerns he has towards the system and all the things he said is not right...Doesn’t it dawn upon him that it was the Congress who has been in power since the last 10 years? How come he himself is complaining about the system and centralization of power?

Rahul is a tutored parrot and not capable of speaking beyond what is instructed. But one thing is sure that he is well trained in corruption issues. The Rahul Gandhi's idea of talking about balance of Power without taking responsibility as a leader suggests that, he and the congress wants to continue present system of functioning without accountability which is easy route for being scot free in spite of large scale and high magnitude scams. The idea of not announcing the Prime Minister candidate suggests that even if congress could form the next government after the elections, Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi will continue to be proxy rules without any responsibility and accountability and enjoy only the fruits of power (plundering the nation and generating black money). It is a well-known fact that only those having the blessings of high command Sonia and Rahul Gandhi can be Central Ministers or Chief Ministers of states. If that is so in all the corruptions whether 2G, Coalgate, chopper scam etc. by central govt. or CWC, Adarsh etc. by their chief ministers are indirectly orchestrated by the high command Sonia and Rahul Gandhi. Then, is it not absurd to expect concrete actions against such corruptions from Sonia Gandhi or Rahul Gandhi. In reaction to the interview, the so called senior generalist like Vinod Mehta and Ramesh Varadharajan in utter nonsense praises the Rahul's intention to change the system. It would be appropriate, if they have questioned Rahul that it is the congress which ruled for 60 years out of 65 years is the cause for the current system which he wanted to change. 

Further Rahul and his mother created a new system of conducting the Central Government like a puppet show giving Dr.Manmohan Singh a lead role, who dances to the hand movements of the masters. If this is the functioning of the Central Government, then who is responsible for the various large scale scams and present state of affair of the economy? Time is not far away when you will see the scams in the MNREGA and RTI process also. Even today if you file any RTI you don’t get any answer easily.

People of INDIA won't be fooled this time by Congress gimmick. Congress has ruled INDIA for 60 years and still there is no development, infrastructure, education, poverty, hunger. Congress’ only policy is divide and rule. They should be punished for not letting INDIA be what it deserves. INDIA was not poor; Congress has made it poor by corruption & vote bank politics.

People, who think Rahul Gandhi can be the prime minister, are the same who thinks that using Axe deodorant would get them laid..:)

Two Questions from our side:

1. Every single Investigating Agency appointed by Congress Party Government in Delhi has declared that Narendra Modi is innocent and he was not involved in the riots either directly or indirectly. Every single Court has given similar verdict of innocence of NaMo. Then why are you so desperate to somehow try to hold Narendra Modi responsible for the 2002 riots?
   
   So many riots have taken place in Maharashtra, UP, Delhi. Who was the CM?? Why Congress government does talk of it?? 2002 riots were unfortunate after which there is not a single riot in Gujarat. Law and order is the best in country. When Supreme Court has given Narendra Modi clean chit then forget it.
2. The 1984 anti-Sikh riots were planned, orchestrated & carried out by Congress leaders like Sajjan Kumar and Jagdish Tytler. The successive Congress Governments tried hard to prove its innocence in the riots, but Court cases on Congress Party leaders are still going on in Courts. Does this fact not prove that Congress party was involved in the anti-Sikh riots? Why Prime Minister – Dr. Man Mohan Singh is apologizing to Sikh Community??

Chaiwala Modi

The tea corners in India are known for many intellectual political discussions. Commoners from all walks of life congregate at this point and discuss and often impose their political and social ideas on each other. Every person himself is a great orator, trying every trick from loud shouts to artistic maneuver of hands and face expressions; the only aim is to prevail over others.

“Narendra Modi wants to become a PM. Someone rising from a tea shop can never have a national perspective. Like, if you make a ‘sipahi’ (constable) as ‘kaptan’ (Superintendent of Police), he can never have SP’s approach but will have that of a constable,” Agarwal had said in Hardoi in Uttar Pradesh.

“I promise you in 21st Century Narendra Modi will never become the Prime Minister of the country. …But if he wants to distribute tea here, we will find a place for him,” Aiyar said at the venue of the AICC meeting here.

Aiyer’s comment about a’ chaiwala ‘ Modi is certainly not of good taste. Aiyer is intellectual enough to do better. However, he must have been provoked to utter such low level ‘rebuff’ out of his anger against Modi having repeatedly made derogatory remarks about Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and many other Congress leaders so frequently.

Modi had earlier taken on Rahul Gandhi with a jibe about being “born with a golden spoon” to suggest that the occasional poverty tourism of the Congress vice president would not make him feel empathy for the poor unlike Modi himself whose underprivileged origins and upbringing make millions consider him one among them

Very happy to listen the speech by Modi as reply to Aiyar’s insulting comments. Modi also thoroughly exploited his statement to return the ‘stick’ back to congress with more beating and now have to run for cover. Congress asked for it. We have had enough with people borne with golden spoon in their mouth who simply don’t understand the ordinary people of the country. One has to suffer and toil to understand the suffering or toiling in life. Just visiting a house of poor man’s hut and have dinner with them cannot help you out to learn about them. To provide dinner to their visitor these poor people must have spent their hard earned money which could have otherwise lasted minimum for a week. All public stunts to fool the general public.

It is not without reason that the more articulate Congress leaders such as Finance Minister P Chidambaram no longer feel shy in calling him a serious challenge, to be no longer ignored. He is aggressive and unpredictable and comes up with phrases like ‘Shahzada’ for Rahul, which are hugely disturbing for the Congress and have huge mass appeal.

If one goes by Mani Shankar Aiyer’s logic, then George Washington should never have been President of U. S. nor should Sir Winston Churchill have been Prime Minister of England. Washington was a “son of wood chopper” and Winston sold newspapers on London streets. Abraham Lincoln had his origins to a cobbler profession. That Mr. Aiyer lacks basic knowledge of history and politics as also sociology is a very poor reflection of his standing in the Congress. I think Congress should ask him to shut his mouth. Low beginning is no crime. I think Mr. Aiyer owes it to the Congress Party and the nation as a whole to unreservedly apologize for his “Chai Wala” remarks.

Tea and its potent power to shake the world is not a new phenomenon. Persons like Mani who mocks tea business do not understand its dignity or historic role in big changes. It can even demolish empires. The Boston tea party is a turning point in world history (not a tea party actually but tea import) from this incident arose the big challenge to British rule in America and the push to American Revolution. Tea may be just a cupful but can transform the world and those who drink. In Asia the British’ love for tea led to Opium war with China. And from Assam to Munnar came up lakhs of acres of tea estates. So the windfall from tea will be there always.’

Today, Narendra Modi is emerging as a political icon, not only in India but internationally. But this phenomenon had a humble beginning. It took a lifetime for Modi to climb the top of the political ladder. Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi also began his political oratory from a ‘chai’ corner that used to be the bread winner of the leader and his brother. From a Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) pracharak in the late 1980s to prime ministerial nominee, Modi’s meteoric rise in politics is action packed as well as a reflection of paradoxes that underline India’s social and economic transformation over the past two decades. For politics, he blends modern technology with medieval ideology. He is a demagogue par excellence and a master strategist. He turns adversity into opportunity with ease and he is perceived as Hindutva hard-liner who has complete backing of the RSS, the ideological fountainhead of the saffron party.

Modi in many ways represents the new, young and aspirational India. He may have sold tea on a railway platform for a living in his childhood but he had the grit to move on, innovating in emerging situations and capitalising on every single opportunity that came his way right up to where he is today – principal challenger to the topmost position in the country. Over time, Modi became a symbol of development and the party’s ability to deliver good governance. Large sections of the middle class began to root for him, especially for his I-can-do attitude and his resolve to fix the ills of the nation plaguing by multiple problems, including a languishing economy

His detractors hate his guts; his supporters swear by him. He is a politician who apparently delivers on governance. He is a loner, yet no other leader connects with the electorate as he does.

Political analyst GVL Narasimha Rao, who knows Modi intimately, said, “He is a man of firm conviction. He is extremely honest and hardworking. He has not given to compromises, whatever the consequences. And Modi will never bend even for the sake of a temporary victory.”